Is it the End of Neutrality for Switzerland?

Switzerland’s Paradigm Shift: Embracing the European Sky Shield Initiative

Dr. Hichem Karoui

Abstract

Switzerland’s recent accession to the European Sky Shield initiative portends a potential shift away from the spirit of neutrality that has long characterized Switzerland. This paper examines the controversial discourse surrounding the implications for Swiss defense strategies, international diplomacy, and engagement in broader regional conflicts.

The fallout from Russia’s incursion into Ukraine has spurred a reshaping of European defense doctrines, pushing Switzerland towards military modernization, in stark contrast to long-standing principles of neutrality. This analysis illustrates the complex dilemma of reconciling Switzerland’s long-established neutral stance with emerging security imperatives and international pressures.

Diverse perspectives emerge regarding potential repercussions, such as escalating military spending, diplomatic realignment, and the pivotal influence of public sentiment in shaping future defense strategies. The paper assesses the prospective fortification of Switzerland’s military apparatus, possibly at the expense of its diplomatic influence, underscoring the need for prudent reflection in an ever-evolving security environment.

This complexity-laden trajectory forces stakeholders to navigate an uncertain landscape where traditional neutrality coexists with growing military commitments, necessitating ongoing debate and scrutiny in the national and international spheres.

Keywords:

Switzerland, Neutrality, European Sky Shield Initiative, Defense policy, International relations, International pressures, Public sentiment.

I.     Introduction

A major change in foreign policy has happened as Switzerland becomes part of the European Sky Shield Initiative. This move is due to increased security worries after the outbreak of war between Russia and Ukraine. By officially joining this teamwork in defense, Swiss leaders show a big shift from a long-held belief in neutrality. This change brings up important questions about what it means for Switzerland’s military position and its international relationships, especially with ongoing talks about arms re-exports and military spending. Supporters of the new policy say that joining larger defense efforts will boost national security and unity with European allies. However, critics worry that this could weaken Switzerland’s neutrality and escalate geopolitical issues. Public opinion is split on this matter, highlighting how important citizens’ views are in shaping the country’s changing stance on neutrality. As Switzerland reevaluates its role, the effects of this decision may go beyond Europe, possibly affecting global diplomatic relations, including those in the Middle East.

1.1-Overview of Switzerland’s historical stance on neutrality

Switzerland has a long history of staying neutral, a key part of its identity since the early 1800s. This approach became clear after the Napoleonic Wars, as the 1815 Treaty of Paris recognized Swiss neutrality as an important part of European diplomatic ties. Switzerland’s neutrality helped it avoid the heavy destruction seen in many nearby countries during the World Wars, making it a place for diplomacy and humanitarian work. But now, with new global security threats—especially as the war between Russia and Ukraine intensifies—Switzerland is reconsidering this tradition. The choice to join the European Sky Shield Initiative is a significant change that might indicate a movement away from strict neutrality, showing that Swiss neutrality could be put to the test as the country adjusts to current geopolitical situations and a more connected European defense system.

1.2- Recent developments regarding the European Sky Shield Initiative

A big change in Switzerland’s defense strategy has come after the government decided to join the European Sky Shield Initiative, which is about making a joint missile defense system in Europe. This move shows that Switzerland is moving away from its long-standing neutral policies and is reacting to the changing security situation in Europe since the start of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict. The initiative, suggested by Germany, highlights the need for working together for defense, pointing out NATO’s growing role in keeping the region stable (Simonet et al., 2023). This change in strategy has effects on military spending, as Switzerland is now thinking about raising its defense budget to 1% of GDP, leading to debates about the country’s usual neutrality and how it fits with Western military systems (Gangjee et al., 2024). As Swiss citizens deal with these changes, public opinion will be key in deciding how much the nation is ready to change its historical position, bringing up worries about what this means for Switzerland’s global relationships and its involvement in geopolitical issues.

1.3- The Problematic: Analyzing the implications of Switzerland’s potential shift from neutrality in light of recent military collaborations and public sentiment.

Recent moves in Switzerland’s military partnerships suggest a big change in its long-standing neutrality, which raises important questions about what this might mean. The choice to join the European Sky Shield Initiative, announced by the Swiss government on October 19, makes Switzerland an active participant in a defense network created in response to rising threats, especially after Russia’s actions regarding Ukraine. This change not only alters Switzerland’s position in Europe’s defense but also shows a shift in public opinion, as more Swiss citizens seem to favor greater military involvement. The decision to remove the ban on arms re-exports adds complexity to international relations, possibly straining connections with nations that have been historically aligned with Switzerland’s neutrality. In the end, looking at this crucial moment indicates that Switzerland is trying to balance its traditional stance with the need to adapt to current geopolitical challenges, which could have significant effects on both regional and global security.

II.  Historical Context of Swiss Neutrality

Switzerland has kept a neutral stance for centuries, but its foreign policy has changed a lot due to geopolitical changes. Since the Peace of Westphalia in 1648, Switzerland has stayed out of conflicts and served as a mediator and a center for international diplomacy. Yet, with the start of the Ukraine conflict and changes in European security, Swiss leaders are rethinking this long-held policy. The country’s recent choice to join the European Sky Shield Initiative shows a major change, aligning Swiss defense with Europe’s need for collective security in a more unstable world. This move is not just a military tactic but also raises questions about the core principles of Swiss neutrality, pondering if the nation can keep its historical identity while facing modern security threats (Edgar Bonjour, 1946). The effects of these changes might reach far beyond Europe, influencing Switzerland’s role globally.

2.1- Evolution of Switzerland’s neutrality policy over the centuries

Switzerland’s long-held policy of neutrality has changed a lot due to new world events. Initially created to keep peace and stay out of European wars, this policy is now under review, especially with current global tensions. Joining the European Sky Shield Initiative is a major change, showing a response to modern security issues like Russia’s attack on Ukraine, which highlights the urgent need for teamwork in defense. This situation brings up important questions about the future of military neutrality and if Swiss neutrality can happen alongside taking part in defense programs (Martin Dahinden, 2021). Also, public opinion is split on these matters, as people consider the effects of increased military spending versus the traditional belief in neutrality (Dr. Steven Murphy 2024). As a result, this changing position not only impacts Switzerland’s global relations and defense plans but also raises concerns about its involvement in wider regional conflicts.

2.2- Key events that have shaped Swiss neutrality, including World Wars

Even though Switzerland has a long history of neutrality, its role has been greatly affected by important historical events, especially during the World Wars. World War II is a key moment, showing the country’s complicated economic ties with Nazi Germany, which were based on need instead of moral agreement. As discussed in (Schandler et al., 2005), Switzerland’s neutrality was financially weak, depending on trading deals to get vital resources that were hard to come by from the Allies. This practical way of maintaining neutrality, however, created tension in Swiss-American relations and left deep marks that became clear during the Cold War, making Switzerland’s global position more difficult. Moreover, the shift towards more military-focused policies, such as its recent joining of the European Sky Shield Initiative, raises concerns about the future of Swiss neutrality. The effects of these changes might indicate a significant shift in Switzerland’s role in the world, possibly moving away from its traditional character.

2.3- The significance of neutrality in Swiss identity and foreign relations

Switzerland’s neutrality has been important for its identity and foreign relations. It represents values like independence and peace. This approach has made Switzerland seem like a stable intermediary in global diplomacy, allowing it to host many international organizations and talks. However, the recent choice to join the European Sky Shield Initiative is a major change. This decision shows the change in security worries because of increased geopolitical tensions, especially after Russia’s actions against Ukraine. Joining this missile defense system indicates a need to balance traditional neutrality with new security needs, which is important for Swiss citizens who usually prefer non-alignment. As public opinion starts to recognize the need to adjust security policies, critical social constructivist views on national identity and international relations become important (Adler et al., 2008). This situation raises significant questions about what Swiss neutrality will look like in a more polarized world (Devine et al., 2008).

III.          Recent Developments and Military Collaborations

Switzerland’s new choice to join the European Sky Shield Initiative marks a big change in its usual neutral position, showing how security issues in Europe are changing. This initiative came from the need for more military cooperation in relation to the Russian-Ukrainian war, showing a forward response to current dangers. Switzerland’s membership as the fifteenth participant highlights a serious commitment to joint defense, in line with wider European efforts to create a unified missile defense system. Some critics say this action weakens Switzerland’s long-held neutral policy; however, supporters argue that working together in military frameworks is necessary for national safety in a world that is becoming more unstable. Moreover, ending limits on arms re-exports could help build stronger partnerships, but it could also create tension with long-time neutral allies in the global community. As a result, public opinion and potential economic impacts from rising military spending will be important factors in determining the future of Switzerland’s neutrality policy.

3.1- Details of Switzerland’s integration into the European Sky Shield Initiative

Switzerland made big changes in its defense approach with its new choice to join the European Sky Shield Initiative, which was announced on October 19. This move responds to the changing geopolitical situation, notably the dangers of Russia’s conflict with Ukraine. Traditionally seen as neutral, Switzerland’s participation in this missile defense system shows a major change in its security policy, raising concerns about what this means for its long-standing neutrality. By becoming the fifteenth member of this initiative, Switzerland hopes to strengthen its military through a united European effort, addressing the challenges of modern warfare that require more teamwork in security. Critics believe this would weaken Switzerland’s neutral position, while supporters argue it is a necessary response to current threats and fits with broader European defense goals that highlight the need for strategic independence in a more unstable world (Simonet et al., 2023). In the end, this choice puts Switzerland at a turning point, reconsidering its role in European security while dealing with the effects on its neutral identity.

3.2- The impact of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine on European defense strategies

Due to recent global conflicts, European countries are rethinking old defense plans, especially because of the Russia- Ukraine  war. This war has sped up talks about military partnerships and defense budgets in Europe, as shown by Switzerland’s recent choice to take part in the European Sky Shield Initiative. Switzerland, which has usually kept a neutral stance, is now making changes to its defense approach, which aligns more with European security needs, as noted by (Merel Selleslach et al., 2024). This emphasizes a shared duty that goes beyond standard foreign policy. As Switzerland boosts its military role, there are concerns about what this means for its neutrality and the legal obligations that might be violated, as mentioned in (Felix Müller, 2023). Many Swiss people now see the need for better security, indicating that the country could be heading toward a closer defense alliance with Europe to tackle new dangers.

3.3- Analysis of Switzerland’s military capabilities and their relevance to neutrality

With recent global tensions, especially after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, Switzerland’s military abilities are being looked at concerning its neutrality. By deciding to join the European Sky Shield Initiative, Switzerland shows a big change in its defense policy, connecting itself with wider European security plans (Kornegay Jr. et al., 2024). This initiative focuses on creating joint missile defense systems across Europe, showing a willingness to strengthen defensive powers due to changing threats. Traditionally, Switzerland has kept a strong military, focusing on self-defense instead of getting involved in global conflicts; however, the idea of its neutrality is being reconsidered. As Switzerland thinks about raising military spending to 1% of its GDP, public opinion becomes an important factor. Citizens have mixed opinions about moving away from their long-held neutrality, pointing out the careful balance between national safety and traditional beliefs. This change could reshape Switzerland’s place in European security while challenging the usual view of its neutrality.

Table (1): An analysis of Switzerland’s current military capabilities

So, as the table above indicates, while Switzerland maintains its traditional neutrality, these developments indicate a focus on modernizing and strengthening its military capabilities in response to evolving security challenges in Europe.

IV.           Public Opinion and Political Implications

Switzerland is getting ready to join the European Sky Shield Initiative, and people are starting to question the country’s long-standing neutrality. This move into a missile defense program brings up big questions about how the public sees military involvement and what it means for Switzerland’s place in the world. Many Swiss people have always supported neutrality as the key to their identity, seeing it as protection from getting involved in other countries’ conflicts. But with changes in global politics, especially after the outbreak of a violent conflict in the center of Europe between Russia and Ukraine, these opinions might change, leading to a possible review of public views on defense policies. Some critics point out that the story of neutrality, discussed in ideas like the Unneutral Ireland thesis, shows a concept that is often misunderstood or made too simple, indicating that Swiss neutrality could face similar risks (Devine et al., 2008); (Devine et al., 2006). In the end, the changing situation may push leaders to find a way to combine traditional neutrality with new defense partnerships, showing the challenges of modern international relations.

4.1- Current public sentiment regarding changes to the neutrality policy

Changes in public opinion about Switzerland’s neutrality policy have become more divided since the government’s new announcement. Supporters think that joining the European Sky Shield Initiative is a needed update for national defense, especially due to new global threats emphasized by Russia’s actions in Ukraine. This feeling is based on the belief – real or imagined – that neutrality might not ensure safety anymore in a chaotic world. On the other side, critics worry that moving away from long-held neutrality could damage Switzerland’s image as a mediator and a place for humanitarian efforts, risking the relationships with both old friends and enemies (Edgar Bonjour, 1946). As talks about increasing military spending and arms re-export policies ignite discussions, the Swiss public struggles to balance the country’s traditional neutrality with current security demands, highlighting the important part of public opinion in influencing future defense plans.

4.2- The role of Swiss citizens in shaping defense and foreign policy decisions

Swiss neutrality has been a key part of its national identity and policy for a long time. However, recent changes indicate that public opinion  may shift regarding defense and foreign relations. The involvement of Switzerland in the European Sky Shield Initiative, a joint defense movement prompted by the upheaval caused by the  Russia-Ukraine standoff, shows this trend. The Swiss people, who have a strong history of direct democracy, are becoming more aware of what military partnerships mean. As they deal with potential increases in defense spending—likely to reach 1% of GDP—some are worried about moving away from neutrality, while others believe that changes are necessary due to an unstable global environment (Ellie Leung, 2024). This changing situation reflects their views and places neutral Switzerland at an important point in its foreign policy.

4.3- Potential political ramifications of altering the neutrality stance on domestic governance

Switzerland’s recent choice to give up its long-held neutrality for joining the European Sky Shield Initiative starts a complicated discussion about the political effects on its domestic governance. Traditionally, neutrality has been a key part of Swiss identity, creating a unique political climate that keeps the nation away from outside conflicts. Changing this stance might cause domestic opposition, as many citizens worry that joining military alliances could pull Switzerland into larger geopolitical issues, threatening its tradition of peace and stability. Additionally, this change could increase tensions with nations that see this decision as a break from Switzerland’s diplomatic honesty, possibly leading to political isolation on the global stage. As Sir Tim Berners-Lee points out, the unexpected results of big changes often disrupt the original principles, which aligns with the worries of Switzerland losing its neutrality for more military involvement ((Bryant et al., 2020), (Sattar et al., 2023)).

V.   Conclusion

For decades, Switzerland’s foreign policy has been based on neutrality. However, recent changes, such as joining the European Sky Shield Initiative, may indicate a possible change in this long-standing practice. The choice to become part of this defense structure was influenced by rising geopolitical issues from the Russia- Ukraine war and shows a shifting view of national security in a more connected world. Some critics say this action goes against Switzerland’s historical neutrality, while supporters argue it increases security and encourages cooperation among European countries (Gezim Vllasi, 2023). Furthermore, talks about raising military spending to 1% of GDP could financially affect neutrality, bringing Switzerland closer to military alliances (Hug et al., 2023). As public opinion shifts, the chance of reconsidering neutrality becomes more urgent, prompting questions about the nation’s future role in conflicts, especially in Europe and other regions.

Based on the previous analysis, there are several potential risks for Switzerland if it abandons its long-standing neutrality policy:

1. Becoming a military target: By aligning more closely with NATO and the EU militarily, Switzerland could make itself a legitimate target in potential future conflicts (United World International, 2024). As a neutral country, Switzerland has historically avoided being drawn into wars.
2. Loss of diplomatic role: Switzerland’s neutrality has allowed it to act as a mediator in international conflicts and host peace talks. Abandoning neutrality could compromise this valuable diplomatic position (United World International, 2024).
3. Economic impacts: Switzerland’s arms exports have already declined 27% due to restrictions on selling to countries in conflict (NATO Watch, 2024). Further military alignment could impact trade relationships with non-NATO countries.
4. Domestic political division: There appears to be significant domestic opposition to abandoning neutrality, with 91% of Swiss citizens supporting maintaining neutrality in a 2023 survey (Ewe, 2024). Changing this policy could create internal political tensions.
5. Reduced national sovereignty: Closer military integration with NATO and the EU could limit Switzerland’s ability to make independent foreign policy and security decisions (Ewe, 2024).
6. Escalation of tensions: By joining a military bloc, Switzerland could contribute to further polarization between NATO and rival powers like Russia, potentially increasing overall geopolitical tensions (United World International, 2024).
7. Loss of unique identity: Switzerland’s neutrality has been a core part of its national identity for centuries. Abandoning it could fundamentally alter how Switzerland is perceived globally.
8. Increased military spending: The proposals include increasing defense spending to 1% of GDP, which would divert resources from other areas (NATO Watch, 2024).
9. Potential involvement in conflicts: Deeper NATO cooperation could lead to pressure for Switzerland to participate in military operations it might otherwise avoid.

While proponents argue closer Western alignment would improve Switzerland’s security, critics contend it could actually increase risks by eroding the protective benefits of neutrality that Switzerland has long enjoyed. The debate reflects the complex security calculations Switzerland faces in a changing geopolitical landscape.

1- Summary of key arguments regarding the end of neutrality

Recent changes show a big shift in Switzerland’s old policy of staying neutral, mainly shown by its choice to join the European Sky Shield Initiative. Critics say this decision goes against many years of neutrality and could pull Switzerland into global conflicts, especially with tensions rising in Europe and beyond. On the other hand, supporters claim that working more closely in military matters is crucial for the country’s defense and regional safety when European security faces major threats. Moreover, removing the ban on arms re-exports might improve international relations, creating alliances but also complicating Switzerland’s historically neutral position maintained through careful non-military involvement. Public opinion will play an important role if this change takes place, as people weigh improved defense capabilities against the importance of traditions of neutrality and independence.  In the end, joining in collective defense efforts raises questions about the future of Swiss neutrality, possibly indicating a move towards more active involvement in European security frameworks, as discussed in academic critiques of conventional neutrality ideas (Devine et al., 2008)(Devine et al., 2006).

Table (2): Opposite Views

Thus, we see that the debate reflects the complex challenge Switzerland faces in balancing its traditional neutral stance with evolving security needs and international pressures. While there is growing discussion about modifying aspects of neutrality policy, complete abandonment seems unlikely given strong public support for the principle.

2- Future outlook for Switzerland’s role in international relations

Switzerland has a long history of staying neutral, but recent world events suggest it might change how it interacts internationally. By deciding to join the European Sky Shield Initiative, Switzerland shows it understands the importance of European security, especially with the escalating threats between Russia on the one hand and NATO allies on the other, following the outbreak of the war in Ukraine. This move toward working together in defense could strengthen Switzerland’s military in the eyes of some and weaken its diplomatic power in the eyes of others.  While Switzerland is considering raising military spending to 1% of its GDP, this may have big effects on its economy, allowing more money for defense technology and infrastructure. However, public opinion plays a key role; the Swiss people have always been cautious about changing their neutrality. The changing security situation brings up questions about how joining these initiatives may alter Switzerland’s identity and role, possibly ending its distance from collaborative military efforts (Liebetrau et al., 2023)(Leechor et al., 2024).

ــــــــــــــــــــــ

 Sources and References

• Adler, E., Agius, C., Almond, G., Andrén, N., Arbuckle, J., Bardes, B., Blank, T., Burchill, S., Byrne, B. M., Calvocoressi, P., Checkel, J., Dahl, A.-S., Der Derian, J., Doherty, R., Dougherty, J., Eichenberg, R., Everts, P., Fanning, R., Fianna Fáil, Fisk, R., FitzGerald, G., Freymond, J., Gilland, K., Government of Ireland, Hart, D., Holsti, O., Hopf, T., Irish Times, Isernia, P., Ispas, J., Jacobsen, J. K., Jessup, P., Joenniemi, P., Jupille, J., Jørgensen, K. E., Karen Devine, Karsh, E., Keatinge, P., Kelloway, K., Kline, R., Knopf, J., Kubálková, V., Kux, S., Larsen, H., Lippmann, W., McSweeney, B., Morgenthau, H., MRBI, Ogley, R., Price, R., Rengger, N., Reus-Smit, C., Rosenau, J., Salmon, T., Schmidt, P., Seville Declaration, Sinnott, R., Sniderman, P., Sundelius, B., Thalberg, H., Tooze, R., Vukadinovic, R., Waltz, K., Weber, C., Wittkopf, E., & Wæver, O. (2008). Stretching the IR theoretical spectrum on Irish neutrality: A critical social constructivist framework. SAGE Publications. https://core.ac.uk/download/11308473.pdf
• Bryant, A. (2020). What the web has wrought. MDPI AG. https://core.ac.uk/download/327947851.pdf
• Burke, C. (2004). Irish neutrality: What are the costs and benefits of Ireland’s policy of neutrality? https://core.ac.uk/download/297016502.pdf
• DEDIU, G. O. (2023). The Non-Aligned Movement and its relation with Europe: An analysis of its historical and contemporary relevance. https://core.ac.uk/download/588603535.pdf
• Devine, K. (2006). The myth of ‘the myth of Irish neutrality’: Deconstructing concepts of Irish neutrality using international relations theories. Royal Irish Academy. https://core.ac.uk/download/11309204.pdf
• Devine, K. (2008). A comparative critique of the practice of Irish neutrality in the ‘unneutral’ discourse. Royal Irish Academy. https://core.ac.uk/download/11308665.pdf
• Edgar, B. (1946). Revival: Swiss neutrality (1946): Its history and meaning (1st ed.). Routledge. Republished 2019. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351253567
• Ellie, L. (2024). Economic adaptations of neutral nations during international conflicts: Political strategies during WWI and WWII. Terra Science and Education, 6(7). https://terra-docs.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/IJHSR/Articles/volume6-issue7/IJHSR_2024_67_39.pdf
• Ewe, K. (2024, April 12). Switzerland to vote on country’s neutrality policy. TIME. https://time.com/6966223/switzerland-neutrality-initiative-vote/
• Felix, M. (2023). Neutrality in the Russia-Ukraine war: The case of Austria from a constitutional and international law perspective. Diplomatische Akademie Wien. https://phaidra.univie.ac.at/detail/o:1941321.pdf
• Fiorenza, N. (2024, May 23). Future artillery 2024: Switzerland modernizes artillery. Default. https://www.janes.com/osint-insights/defence-news/land/future-artillery-2024-switzerland-modernises-artillery
• Freiermuth, S. (2015). Competing conceptions of a “Swiss” national identity and their effect on attitudes towards the “foreign other.” Universitat Jaume I. https://core.ac.uk/download/61471268.pdf
• Gangjee, D. S. (2024). Panoptic brand protection? Algorithmic ascendancy in online marketplaces. Sweet and Maxwell. https://core.ac.uk/download/613172028.pdf
• Gezim, V. (2023). Explaining small neutral states’ foreign policy: Evidence from Switzerland and Austria case. Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz. https://unipub.uni-graz.at/obvugrhs/content/titleinfo/9726548/full.pdf
• (2024, August 1). 2021 Switzerland military strength. Www.globalfirepower.com. https://www.globalfirepower.com/country-military-strength-detail.php?country_id=switzerland
• Hug, G., Demiray, T., Filippini, M., Guidati, G., Oswald, K., Patt, A., Sansavini, G., Schaffner, C., Schwarz, M., & Steffen, B. (2023). Energy security in a net zero emissions future for Switzerland. ETH Zurich. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000614564
• Kholina, M. (2024, April 9). Switzerland will abandon neutrality in case of Russian attack on NATO – President. RBC-Ukraine. https://newsukraine.rbc.ua/news/switzerland-will-abandon-neutrality-in-case-1712666347.html
• Kornegay Jr., P., & Moyer, J. C. (2024). Freerider or strategic balancer? Austria vis-à-vis NATO and Russia: US perspective on Austrian neutrality politics. Universidad Norbert Wiener. https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/document/95362/1/ssoar-2024-moyer_et_al-Freerider_or_Strategic_Balancer_Austria.pdf
• Kümin, B. A. (2009). Political culture in the Holy Roman Empire. Oxford University Press (OUP). https://core.ac.uk/download/49069.pdf
• Leechor, C., & Mintz, J. M. (n.d.). Taxing foreign income in capital-importing countries: Thailand’s perspective. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/6644980.pdf
• Liebetrau, T., & Monsees, L. (2023). Assembling publics: Microsoft, cybersecurity, and public‐private relations. PRT. https://core.ac.uk/download/590381161.pdf
• Martin, D. (2021). Swiss neutrality in the age of cyber warfare. ICT4Peace Foundation. ict4peace.org
• Möckli, D. (2024, October 4). The Swiss neutrality debate: An overview. ch. https://css.ethz.ch/en/center/CSS-news/2024/10/swiss-neutrality-debate-an-overview.html
• Morning Star. (2024, August 30). Swiss report suggests 500+ years of neutrality could be ditched for NATO co-operation. Morning Star. https://morningstaronline.co.uk/article/swiss-report-suggests-500-years-neutrality-could-be-ditched-nato-co-operation
• NATO Watch. (2024). Swiss security experts advise a rethink on neutrality and closer ties with NATO | NATO Watch. org. https://natowatch.org/newsbriefs/2024/swiss-security-experts-advise-rethink-neutrality-and-closer-ties-nato
• (2024). Switzerland’s neutrality under review amid Ukraine war. English.nv.ua. https://english.nv.ua/nation/switzerland-s-neutrality-under-review-amid-ukraine-war-50447351.html
• Omoleke, M., Nyekwere, E. H., Ole, N. C. (2022). Tackling the global environmental problem of climate change through COVID-19 economic recovery stimulus packages: Some suggested legal strategies. International Institute for Science, Technology and Education. https://core.ac.uk/download/543639027.pdf
• Sattar, I. (2023). Pakistan’s security dilemma in the era of great power competition. Monterey, CA; Naval Postgraduate School. https://core.ac.uk/download/610636840.pdf
• Schandler, M. (2005). The economics of neutrality: Switzerland and the United States in World War II. LSU Digital Commons. https://core.ac.uk/download/217399811.pdf
• Simonet, L. (2023). NATO’s 2022 strategic concept: Analysis and implications for Austria. Universidad Norbert Wiener. https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/document/85195/1/ssoar-2023-simonet-NATOs_2022_Strategic_Concept_Analysis.pdf
• Simonet, L. (2023). The technical limits of the EU: Europe’s defense economy as a driving force for strategic autonomy and technological sovereignty. Universidad Norbert Wiener. https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/document/92200/1/ssoar-2023-simonet-The_technical_limits_of_the.pdf
• Tenev, M. (2024, October 3). Breaking tradition: Why Russia’s war is making Switzerland question its neutrality. ECFR; European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR). https://ecfr.eu/article/breaking-tradition-why-russias-war-is-making-switzerland-question-its-neutrality/
• United World International. (2024, September 21). United World International. https://unitedworldint.com/35817-switzerlands-historical-neutrality-and-natos-pressure/
• Vllasi, G. (2023). Explaining small neutral states’ foreign policy: Evidence from Switzerland and Austria case. Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz. https://unipub.uni-graz.at/obvugrhs/content/titleinfo/9726548/full.pdf